Expertise Matters About Clients Contact Nederlands Get in touch

Securitisation and structured finance

Support on securitisation and structured finance transactions for originators, arrangers and investors — from warehouse facility to public issuance, covering documentation, Dutch law legal opinions and transaction management.

Structure, documentation and execution

Securitisation is the most documentation-intensive form of financing there is. A transaction that looks simple on one page — receivables move from originator to SPV, the SPV issues notes — involves dozens of interlocking documents in which a single inconsistent definition can undermine a rating, a true sale opinion or STS status.

I work on these transactions on both the originator and the arranger side, and as interim Head of Legal at a European lender I have seen from the inside what it takes to build and run a securitisation programme out of a lending business: not only the documentation, but the data flows, the servicing processes and the reporting obligations that recur every month thereafter.

Transaction types

ABS

Asset-backed securities over consumer credit, SME loans, auto leases, trade receivables and equipment portfolios.

RMBS

Residential mortgage-backed securities, including Dutch mortgage-specific features and foundation structures.

CLO

Collateralised loan obligations and portfolios of syndicated loans.

Warehouse

Warehouse facilities and revolving purchase structures as a route to a take-out securitisation.

Private / bilateral

Privately placed securitisations and forward flow arrangements with one or a few investors.

Other structured finance

Structured financings that borrow securitisation technique without a classic ABS form.

Where the legal risk sits

  • True sale and transferability. Does the assignment work under Dutch law, and what do assignment prohibitions, set-off rights and originator insolvency risk do to the portfolio? Silent assignment raises the further question of when and how notice is given.
  • Bankruptcy remoteness. Foundation boards, orphan structures, limited recourse and non-petition provisions — and whether the structure holds up under stress.
  • Risk retention. The 5% requirement under article 6 of the Securitisation Regulation (EU 2017/2402): who holds the retention, which of the five modalities applies, and how that is documented and demonstrably maintained.
  • Transparency and reporting. Article 7 obligations, investor reporting, the securitisation repository, and who operationally carries the reporting burden.
  • STS qualification. Whether the transaction can achieve simple, transparent and standardised status, what that means for investors' capital treatment, and what the structure must concede to get there.
  • Servicing and back-up servicing. Servicing agreements, servicer replacement triggers, data room and data transfer arrangements.
  • Security and waterfall. The security trustee arrangement, parallel debt, and the priority of payments pre- and post-enforcement.

Documentation

Receivables purchase agreements, servicing agreements, trust deeds and note conditions, security trust deeds and Dutch deeds of pledge, account bank and cash management agreements, subscription agreements, agency agreements — and the accompanying Dutch law legal opinions on capacity, enforceability and true sale. Alongside that, coordination with rating agencies, auditors and tax advisers, and management of the CP list through to closing.

How it connects

Securitisation rarely stands alone. The underlying portfolio comes from lending that is itself documented — see LMA loan documentation — and the originator must be demonstrably in control of onboarding and client due diligence before an arranger or investor takes comfort; see compliance and KYC/CDD. For institutions that need a senior lawyer to stand up a programme, interim support is often the practical route.

Questions that come up often

Do you advise originators or arrangers?

Both, and investors assessing a transaction. On the originator side the work usually starts with the portfolio and whether it is legally transferable and reportable; on the arranger side with the structure and the documentation. Conflicts are checked before each engagement.

Can you give a Dutch law legal opinion?

I draft legal opinions and review counterparty opinions. Where an opinion must formally be issued by an admitted Dutch lawyer or civil-law notary, it is issued through that party and I handle the substantive preparation and analysis.

Is STS qualification always worth it?

Not always. STS reduces capital charges for regulated investors and widens the investor base, but constrains the structure and increases ongoing reporting. Whether it pays depends on the target investors and on whether the portfolio meets the homogeneity and quality criteria. That assessment is best made early, before the documentation is fixed.

Can you maintain an existing programme?

Yes. Ongoing programmes need annual updates, new series, amendments, retention reassessment and article 7 reporting review. That work suits a fixed, limited commitment per month or per series.

Available for new engagements

Ad hoc and interim engagements for banks, lenders, asset managers, corporate service providers and law firms. Send a short description of the transaction or the role and I will usually respond the same day.

Privacy statement

Blijdenstein Legal, established in Amsterdam (Dutch Chamber of Commerce no. 42054857), is the controller for the personal data you share through this website.

When you get in touch — through the contact form or by e-mail — your name, organisation, e-mail address and message are used solely to answer your question. Your data is not shared with third parties, is not used for marketing, and is not kept longer than needed to handle your request.

This website sets no cookies and uses no tracking or analytics services.

You have the right to access, correct and delete your personal data. To do so, write to duco@blijdensteinlegal.nl.